Seeking Approaches for Line-by-Line, File-by-File Agentic Code Review
English summary
A developer admits to running Claude Code and Codex but only vaguely scanning the output, resulting in poor understanding of the codebase. They are asking for a harness or workflow that enables reviewing agent-generated code file by file and method by method. The user seeks community suggestions and the current state of the art for this controlled agentic coding review process.
Chinese summary
一位开发者坦言自己习惯使用Claude Code和Codex工具，但只粗略扫描输出，导致对代码库熟悉度不足。他希望找到一种能逐文件、逐方法审查代理生成代码的工具或工作流。该用户在Hacker News上寻求社区建议，并了解此类受控代理编码审查的当前技术前沿。
Key points
User frequently relies on agentic coding tools (Claude Code, Codex) but only performs superficial review.
用户经常依赖代理编码工具（Claude Code、Codex），但只进行浮于表面的审查。
The lack of deep review leads to poor code-base familiarity and understanding.
缺乏深入审查导致对代码库的熟悉度和理解力不足。
They seek a harness/workflow that forces line-by-line, file-by-file, method-by-method scrutiny of AI-generated code.
他们希望找到一种能强制进行逐行、逐文件、逐方法审查AI生成代码的工具或工作流。
The post asks the community for practical suggestions and the state-of-the-art in this area.
帖子向社区询问实用建议及该领域的最新技术动态。